| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
''Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.'', , was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court set forth the legal test for determining whether to grant deference to a government agency's interpretation of a statute which it administers. ''Chevron'' is the Court's clearest articulation of the doctrine of "administrative deference," to the point that the Court itself has used the phrase "''Chevron'' deference" in more recent cases.〔''United States v. Mead Corp.'', 533 U.S. 218, 226 (2001).〕
==Background==
Under the Supreme Court's ruling in ''Marbury v. Madison'', 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), United States federal courts have the authority to judicially review the statutes enacted by Congress, and declare a statute invalid if it violates the Constitution. But the Constitution sets no express limits on how much federal authority can be delegated to a government agency. Rather, limits on the authority granted to a federal agency occur within the statutes enacted by Congress.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|